Mughal 'paradise' gets tortuous makeover

Posted on 22nd February 2012 in The monuments of world

Mughal ‘paradise’ gets tortuous makeover
By Raja Murthy

Agar Firdaus bar rue Zamin ast, Hamin asto, Hamin asto, Hamin ast!
If there is a paradise on earth, this is it, this is it, this is it!
– 13th century poet Amir Khusrau’s famous couplet describing India, inscribed on the walls of the 17th century Red Fort.

DELHI – The earthly “paradise” that is the Red Fort in Delhi is getting a stuttering makeover even as it continues drawing thousands of visitors as one of Asia’s most popular historical monuments.

The Archaeology Survey of India (ASI) is face-lifting the Red Fort to preserve the site’s tumultuous legacy. The fort not only represents painstaking craftsmanship and creativity, but also a decadent lifestyle that weakened and destroyed one of the most

 

powerful empires in history – the Mughals.

A bit of Mughal-style wealth would come in handy right now, say the restorers. “The Red Fort is far too important a monument to be left neglected,” ASI conservation officer Milind Angaikar told Asia Times Online. “But our biggest challenge is shortage of funds. Being declared a World Heritage monument [in 2007] has not increased the budget.”

No such financial constraints hampered Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan (1592-1666) whose architectural credits include the Taj Majal. He took nearly 10 years to complete building the Red Fort in 1648. There was nothing like it in existence. An English general described it as the greatest palace in the world of that time, if not all time.

Merging Indian, Persian and European art, the fort holds marble and red stone structures of low height set amid wide rectangular lawns, gardens, trees, fountains, music played five times a day, waterways and lights. This palace of palaces was ruled by Mughals, ransacked by Persians and Afghans, colonized by British and retrieved by India.

The largest and most significant of the seven forts or seven old cities of Delhi, the Red Fort, or Lal Qila in Hindi, still carries much significance in modern India. The flag of a free India fluttered here on August 15, 1947. Indian prime ministers have addressed the nation every Independence Day since from the Red Fort ramparts near the Lahore Gate entrance.

The Red Fort gets hours of my time often when I am in Delhi. There is a sense of deja vu, a feeling of wonder at the happiness, sorrows, triumphs, tragedies, intrigues, struggles these skeletons of the past might have seen, the stories the red sandstone walls could tell of the people who lived and died within.

They were a curious breed, those emperors of the Mughal dynasty (1526-1857). The founder, Zahiruddin Muhammad Babar, was descendant of the Mongolian psychopathic mass murderer Ghenghiz Khan from Central Asia. The word “Mughal” comes from “Mongol”.

Shah Jahan, the fifth of the Mughal emperors and builder of the Red Fort, died a prisoner of his son Aurangzeb (1618-1707). Aurangzeb, whose coronation in the Red Fort came after he’d murdered his brothers, became an intolerant extremist, an one-man ancestor of the Taliban who was ignorant to the fact that one respects one’s own religion by respecting others’. His intolerance for non-Muslims destroyed regional alliances his forefathers had built. He was the last of the powerful Mughals who ruled from the Red Fort.

He sowed the seeds for the end of the Mughals, even as the Red Fort was epicenter to one of the largest empires in the world, the second-largest in Asia after the Qing Dynasty domains in China. At its peak, Mughal lands stretched across 4.6 million square kilometers, nearly all of South Asia except for a part of present-day Kerala in south western India.

In the next hundred years, the Red Fort became a temple for the empire’s luxuries and pleasures of the flesh. But attachment to excessive physical comforts can creates mental discomfort, and the following generations of Mughal princes grew up progressively weak and incompetent.

Their final fall came in the Red Fort within 150 years. In 1857, the English colonials captured Bahadur Shah Jafar the second, the 17th and last of Mughals and a figurehead in India’s First War of Independence, which saw him led him out in chains and shipped to exile in Burma (now called Myanmar).

The last known descendant of the Mughals, in the lineage of Babur, Akbar “the Great” and Shah Jahan, was in 2009 discovered living in dire poverty in a Kolkata slum. She was running a small tea stall, and later given a job as a maid servant running errands for the government-owned firm Coal India.

The wealth this maid servant’s Mughal forefathers hoarded in the Red Fort hints at the riches the sub-continent once owned. The loot Persian raider Nadir Shah carried out of Delhi in 1739 needed 1,000 elephants and 800 horses to carry it. His booty included the golden Peacock Throne encrusted with sapphires, emeralds, rubies and the famous Kohinoor diamond now part of the globally stolen property comprising the British queen’s Crown Jewels.

“All this was like a jungle, full of weeds, when I came here,” said gardener Dinanath, watering the lawns in front of the palace where two of the most powerful emperors in the world lived. Dinanath, working here for over 35 years, is part of a team of 105 gardeners trying to recreate a semblance of what was once called Hayat Bakhsh Bagh or “Life-Bestowing Garden”.

The garden had its own “Stream of Paradise” or “Nahri-i – Bisht“, an elaborate waterworks running throughout the royal living quarters. Water lifted from the River Yamuna flowed out of copper and clay pipes in lavishly appointed bathrooms called the “Hamman” to offer a choice of hot, cold and steam baths. In a late February afternoon a few hundred years later, a child delightedly scampered up and down a small wooden board bridging the now bone-dry, dusty “Stream of Paradise”.

“In about two or three months, there will an improved sound and light show with computerized laser beams and projections,” said Pradeep Kumar, manager of the nightly Sound and Light show manager since the mid-1980s. The Red Fort itself was built for light effects. The important edifices, including court halls and the emperor’s living quarters, are laid out to face the setting and rising sun in an east-west line.

The Rang Mahal or “Palace of colors”, for instance, must have been a spectacular sight as the sun rays reflected off small mirrors embedded on ceiling and walls. The late winter sun at about 5.30 pm glowed exactly on the marble pedestal in the Diwan-i-Khaas where the bejeweled golden Peacock Throne once stood, probably turning it into a shimmering glow of rainbow colors.

Even the waterways contributed to the light effects. The water ran through garden tanks with niches for candles or oil lamps – so the flickering light plays on the water and turns it into rippling gold at night.

Yet all the sensory delights of this “paradise” proved a gilded trap that across centuries choked the life out of the Mughals. One of the major reasons the tide turned against them was people revolting against excessive taxation imposed to pay for Mughal luxuries, compared to which European kings of the era could be said to have been living in budget accommodation.

A now poverty-stricken Red Fort depends on revenue from visiting tourists, but at the same time these visitors threaten its existence. “Increasing footfall on the marble floors creates reverberations that are damaging the structures,” says conservation official Angaikar. “Some of the sections that are closed may never be opened again.”

(Copyright 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

Day Trip from Delhi: Taj Mahal and the Red Fort of Agra

Posted on 21st February 2012 in The monuments of world

The stunning architectural beauty of the Taj Mahal, built entirely of white marble, is particularly evident at sunrise and sunset. At sunrise the changing light casts shadows, and at night it seems to glow – especially when there’s a full moon.

The Taj was built by the Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan in memory of his wife, Mumtaz Mahal, in Agra, India, and houses the grave of the beloved queen.

The entrance fee to the Taj has increased to $20, but it’s well worth it to visit this wonder of the world. You’ll find many guides who will point out (for a fee) the best spots for taking photographs. Ticket lines are longest at the west gate and shortest at the south gate.

After you’ve visited the Taj Mahal, take a 2.5-kilometer drive to the Red Fort of Agra, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The fort was originally built with brick by Hindus; the Islamic Mughals later captured the fort and rebuilt it with red sandstone. Be sure to check out the Delhi Gate and the Lahore Gate when entering. Throughout the fort you’ll see the interesting mix of Hindu and Islamic architecture.

Most guide books recommend that you make a day trip from Delhi to Agra to see the Taj Mahal. The city itself is quite dirty and polluted, and there’s little else to warrant spending a night there. The Taj is closed on Fridays, so make sure to schedule your visit on a day to see both monuments.

You can also see the Taj Mahal for free by climbing onto a hotel rooftop in the Taj Ganj neighborhood, or go to a small Krishna temple by the Yamuna River where you can see the Taj or take a boat ride (100 rupees) to see it from the river. If you’re not a fan of crowds, have a guide take you across the Yamuna on a road bridge to Mehtab Bagh for another breathtaking view of the Taj at dawn.

After daytripping at the Taj and Red Fort, be sure to experience the famous Mughlai cooking in the many area restaurants before returning to Delhi.

Springtime in the Gulf

Posted on 20th February 2012 in The monuments of world

(MENAFN – Arab News) This is springtime in the Middle East once again. And I haven’t seen such glorious, reinvigorating weather during my nearly decade of living in the region. This year appears to be really special. Temperatures have dropped to single digits in many parts of the UAE – it even snowed for a bit in the picturesque mountains of Ras Al Khaimah – and the Gulf. With a pleasant, cold snap in the air – it was minus something in Kuwait this month – everyone seems to have brought out their woolens and leathers that are rarely found of any use in our part of the world.

This is perhaps the best time to be in the Gulf right now. And coming from a warm region, the colder it is the better for me. I just can’t have enough of this magical, absolutely rejuvenating weather, forever talking about it with anyone who cares to listen. The air is incredibly sweet and pure. And to live it and breathe in it all seems like the greatest blessing nature could offer one. I am not very religious but right now I feel like bowing my head in total submission and thank Him for all His bounty.

But not everyone appears to enjoy the nature in its full glory and breathtaking splendor. Some can still manage to come up with enough excuses to endlessly grumble and whine about the ways of the world in general and the weather in particular. They huff and puff and sniffle as they complain of cold weather conditions, fog and even the divine breeze flowing from up north and across the Gulf. They almost long for the humid and oppressive weather conditions of an Arabian summer as they go on and on about their wretched flu and all sorts of allergies and diseases that the Arab spring conspires to bring them every year.

And I feel nothing but pity for them. Do they realize what they are missing? Okay, it is a bit chilly perhaps for the thin-skinned and overly sensitive. But it’s not cold-cold as in a depressing English or European winter with overcast, gloomy skies. These low temperatures in the Middle East go with a warm and bright sunlight. This morning when I went down to pick up my phone, forgotten as usual in my car, the burst of sunshine outside took my breath away. It was another clear and bright day with a light breeze caressing those fortunate enough to be up and about, instead of being chained to their desks.

The Khalid Lagoon had turned almost white amid a feeding frenzy of thousands of seagulls and other migratory birds that traverse the distance of thousands of miles to be here this time of the year. I desperately wished I had my camera with me although I have tried to capture this incredible scene before in my own clumsy ways. I watch it all the time from the window of my 9th floor office in Sharjah’s Buheirah Corniche, mesmerized by its awe-inspiring beauty. Maybe this is what Keats had in mind when he wrote: A thing of beauty is a joy forever.

Every time I need a break or simply get bored, I stand near the window and try to drink in the breathtaking beauty of Khalid Lagoon and the whole of Buheirah Corniche. The pearl-shaped lake that joins the Sharjah Creek and further ahead the warm waters of the Gulf is encircled and embraced on all sides by the emerald green landscape and by the tall trees that seem to defy the high-rises all around.

Birds are everywhere, from the ubiquitous seagulls to kingfishers to crows even, perpetually playing, chirping, twittering and feeding. Even the pigeons and doves are there, side by side, happily chipping away at grains or whatever they could spot. There’s something about the winged creatures, especially pigeons with all their noise and fun and games that could bring even the sleepiest and most deserted of places alive. This is my favorite spot in the whole of UAE.

Who would have ever thought you could create such a miracle in the heart of the desert? But then Sharjah and Dubai, and to a great extent, the UAE defy all received notions about the Gulf. While green landscaping, done at a formidable cost, is a common feature and encouraged all across the emirates, Sharjah stands out for its endless greenery and great public parks, not to mention the open grand vistas and magnificent mosques and monuments.

The emirate is not just home to more than 600 mosques; it is also known for its art galleries, museums, world-class universities, libraries and cultural events held throughout the year. No wonder the UNESCO named Sharjah the Cultural Capital of the Arab and Islamic world in 1996.

Interestingly, this preoccupation with the art, culture, knowledge and good things of life goes with a quest for material progress. More than half of the UAE’s thriving manufacturing sector and industries are based in Sharjah.

More important, Sharjah has resisted the reckless, blind development and growth that came with the dawn of the oil era in most Gulf countries.

In its quest for a balanced growth, it has remained faithful to its Islamic identity and Arab traditions even as it has actively encouraged the pursuit of knowledge and arts and culture.

Perhaps, it is because Sharjah’s ruler is himself an accomplished poet, historian and holder of a PhD from a distinguished British university. Perhaps it’s a stretch but I find in the contemporary Sharjah – and the UAE to some extent – the echoes of the 8th century Baghdad under the legendary Abbasid Caliph Harun Al-Rashid, the land of the thousand and one tales and the land of Scheherazade.

Those were the times when the Muslim civilization was at its peak and Baghdad had been the greatest city on earth, not just the capital of the most powerful and richest empire of the time but also a great center of scientific learning and knowledge, home to Dar Al Hikmah, the House of Wisdom founded by Harun Al-Rashid that functioned as a research center and library, in addition to translating the best and brightest minds from around the world, including from ancient Greece and India, into Arabic.

That treasure trove of learning played a critical role in both the Islamic Golden Age and the European Renaissance. Whatever happened to that craving for knowledge that drove the Arabs to far corners of the world? There are lessons to be drawn from Baghdad’s past and Sharjah’s present.

- Aijaz Zaka Syed is a Gulf-based writer. Write him at aijaz.syed@hotmail.com

H'bad: UNESCO gets Qutub Shahi dossier

Posted on 17th February 2012 in The monuments of world

HYDERABAD: The comprehensive dossier and management plan for the Qutub Shahi monuments in Hyderabad (Golconda Fort, Qutub Shahi tombs and Charminar) has been submitted to UNESCO through the Archaeological Survey of India for their recognition as World Heritage Sites. “The dossier was sent well before the deadline of Feb 1,” Prof P Chenna Reddy, Director of State Archeology and Museums, confirmed.

He also said that the State government had given the nod for constituting a committee with chief secretary as the chairman, and representatives of various other stakeholders like the GHMC, ASI, HMDA, Dept of Tourism, Horticulture Dept and others as members. The panel is expected to meet soon to discuss among other things plans for the removal of  encroachments around historical sites.

The State government had proposed the Golconda Fort, Charminar, Qutub Shahi tombs and Badushahi Ashoorkhana for Unesco’s world heritage list-2013. A three-member sub-committee, comprising Dr Amita Baig, Dr Sikha Jain and Dr Priyaleen Singh had inspected these sites last month. The panel, formed by ICOMOS (a Unesco offshoot) and the Union Ministry of Culture, had suggested that individual plans for the conservation of each historical structure be prepared along with fulfilling other criteria like removal of encroachments to get the coveted tag of a World Heritage Site.

A delegation from the Aga Khan Trust for Culture (AKTC), which has shown keen interest in undertaking beautification of the monuments, had visited them in October last and is going to pay another visit in the next few weeks to take its initiative a step further. The trust had proposed an MoU with the Archaeology Department  to chalk out a programme for documentation, laying of gardens, conservation of monuments, civic amenities and involving local community under public-private partnership mode.

Speaking to City Express, Dr Shikha Jain, one of the members of the sub-committee, termed Unesco’s rules for conferment of the World Heritage tag as very rigorous. According to her, first the proposed monument will be placed in a tentative list and later, the State concerned is required to  submit a dossier and management plan by Feb 1. India can submit 2 dossiers every year (1 natural site and 1 cultural site).

“But, unfortunately the track record of placing even 2 dossiers by India has not been very good. So recently (in October 2011), the Ministry of Culture formed a World Heritage Advisory Committee and our sub-committee that visited Hyderabad is part of the WHAC,” she said.

Middle East Online

Posted on 12th February 2012 in The monuments of world

At the Maldives’ National Museum, smashed Buddhist statues are testament to the rise of Islamic extremism and Taliban-style intolerance in a country famous as a laid-back holiday destination.

On Tuesday, as protesters backed by mutinous police toppled president Mohamed Nasheed, a handful of men stormed the Chinese-built museum and destroyed its display of priceless artefacts from the nation’s pre-Islamic era.

“They have effectively erased all evidence of our Buddhist past,” a senior museum official said at the now shuttered building in the capital Male, asking not to be named out of fear for his own safety.

“We lost all our 12th century statues. They were made of coral stone and limestone. They are very brittle and there is no way we can restore them,” he explained.

“I wept when I heard that the entire display had gone. We are good Muslims and we treated these statues only as part of our heritage. It is not against Islam to display these exhibits,” he said.

Five people have since been arrested after they returned the following day to smash the CCTV cameras, he said.

The authorities have banned photography of the damage, conscious that vandalism of this kind which echoes the 2001 destruction of the Bamiyan Buddha statues in Afghanistan by the Taliban is damaging for the nation’s image.

The gates of the two-storeyed grey building, which opened in 2010, are padlocked and an unarmed guard keeps watch.

The Maldives, a collection of more than 1,100 coral-fringed islands surrounded by turquoise seas, is known as a “paradise” holiday destination that draws hundreds of thousands of travellers and honeymooners each year.

Visitors’ contact with the local population is deliberately kept at bay, however, with most foreigners simply transferring from the main international airport directly to their five-star resorts on outlying islands.

Few have any idea they are visiting a country of 330,000 Muslims with no religious freedom, where women can be flogged for extramarital sex and consuming alcohol is illegal for locals.

Islam is the official religion of the Maldives and open practice of any other religion is forbidden and liable to prosecution.

The religious origins of the Maldivian people are not clearly established, but it is believed that a Buddhist king converted to Islam in the 12th century.

Thereafter, the country practised a mostly liberal form of the religion, but more fundamentalist interpretations have spread with the arrival of money and ultra-conservative Salafist preachers from the Middle East.

In 2007, following a bombing that wounded a dozen foreign tourists, the former president Maumoon Abdul Gayoom banned head-to-toe coverings for women as a sign of his intent to battle conservative Islamic thinking.

At the museum, another official said that fundamentalists had threatened to attack the museum on previous occasions unless it withdrew the Buddhist display.

The country’s ultra-conservative Islamic group, the Adhaalath Party, condemned the attack, but said they remained opposed to Nasheed’s decision to accept three monuments from India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.

“Our constitution does not allow idols and that is why we objected to the monuments,” General Secretary Mohamed Muizzu said, referring to the gifts to mark a South Asian summit held in November in the Maldives.

The monuments, which included one of pillar featuring Buddhist motifs, and which had been on display in the southernmost island of Addu, have all since been vandalised.

The Adhaalath party supports new president Mohamed Waheed, who Nasheed accuses of taking part in a coup, and is due to join the new government.

Waheed called the museum attack “totally unacceptable” and denied there was religious violence in his country.

Former foreign minister Ahmed Naseem disagreed.

He said extremists were thriving in the Maldives and that they were partly responsible for the toppling of Nasheed and the installation of Waheed. “What we had was a military coup backed by religious extremists,” he said.

“There is a strong influence of Islamic fundamentalists in the country and they will get stronger,” Naseem said. “These groups are funded from abroad. “This threat is not only to us, but the rest of the world as well.”

The moderate Nasheed, who was educated in Sri Lanka and Britain, was consistently accused of being under the control of Jews and Christians by religious opposition parties now linked to the government.

There were also demonstrations over proposals from the transport ministry to allow direct flights from Israel.

“We strongly condemn the anti-Semitic words and the other commentary recently,” US assistant secretary of state for South Asian affairs Robert Blake said during a visit to Male on Saturday.

“Under President Nasheed, the Maldives tried to improve relations with Israel and showed what a progressive country they were and we really commend them for that.”

Trouble in paradise: Maldives and Islamic extremism

Posted on 12th February 2012 in The monuments of world

At the Maldives‘ National Museum, smashed Buddhist statues are testament to the rise of Islamic extremism and Taliban-style intolerance in a country famous as a laid-back holiday destination.

On Tuesday, as protesters backed by mutinous police toppled president Mohamed Nasheed, a handful of men stormed the Chinese-built museum and destroyed its display of priceless artefacts from the nation’s pre-Islamic era.

“They have effectively erased all evidence of our Buddhist past,” a senior museum official told AFP at the now shuttered building in the capital Male, asking not to be named out of fear for his own safety.

“We lost all our 12th century statues. They were made of coral stone and limestone. They are very brittle and there is no way we can restore them,” he explained.

“I wept when I heard that the entire display had gone. We are good Muslims and we treated these statues only as part of our heritage. It is not against Islam to display these exhibits,” he said.

Five people have since been arrested after they returned the following day to smash the CCTV cameras, he said.

The authorities have banned photography of the damage, conscious that vandalism of this kind which echoes the 2001 destruction of the Bamiyan Buddha statues in Afghanistan by the Taliban is damaging for the nation’s image.

The gates of the two-storeyed grey building, which opened in 2010, are padlocked and an unarmed guard keeps watch.

The Maldives, a collection of more than 1,100 coral-fringed islands surrounded by turquoise seas, is known as a “paradise” holiday destination that draws hundreds of thousands of travellers and honeymooners each year.

Visitors’ contact with the local population is deliberately kept at bay, however, with most foreigners simply transferring from the main international airport directly to their five-star resorts on outlying islands.

Few have any idea they are visiting a country of 330,000 Muslims with no religious freedom, where women can be flogged for extramarital sex and consuming alcohol is illegal for locals.

Islam is the official religion of the Maldives and open practice of any other religion is forbidden and liable to prosecution.

The religious origins of the Maldivian people are not clearly established, but it is believed that a Buddhist king converted to Islam in the 12th century.

Thereafter, the country practised a mostly liberal form of the religion, but more fundamentalist interpretations have spread with the arrival of money and ultra-conservative Salafist preachers from the Middle East.

In 2007, following a bombing that wounded a dozen foreign tourists, the former president Maumoon Abdul Gayoom banned head-to-toe coverings for women as a sign of his intent to battle conservative Islamic thinking.

At the museum, another official said that fundamentalists had threatened to attack the museum on previous occasions unless it withdrew the Buddhist display.

The country’s ultra-conservative Islamic group, the Adhaalath Party, condemned the attack, but said they remained opposed to Nasheed‘s decision to accept three monuments from India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.

“Our constitution does not allow idols and that is why we objected to the monuments,” General Secretary Mohamed Muizzu said, referring to the gifts to mark a South Asian summit held in November in the Maldives.

The monuments, which included one of pillar featuring Buddhist motifs, and which had been on display in the southernmost island of Addu, have all since been vandalised.

The Adhaalath party supports new president Mohamed Waheed, who Nasheed accuses of taking part in a coup, and is due to join the new government.

Waheed called the museum attack “totally unacceptable” and denied there was religious violence in his country.

Former foreign minister Ahmed Naseem disagreed.

He said extremists were thriving in the Maldives and that they were partly responsible for the toppling of Nasheed and the installation of Waheed. “What we had was a military coup backed by religious extremists,” he said.

“There is a strong influence of Islamic fundamentalists in the country and they will get stronger,” Naseem told AFP. “These groups are funded from abroad. “This threat is not only to us, but the rest of the world as well.”

The moderate Nasheed, who was educated in Sri Lanka and Britain, was consistently accused of being under the control of Jews and Christians by religious opposition parties now linked to the government

There were also demonstrations over proposals from the transport ministry to allow direct flights from Israel.

“We strongly condemn the anti-Semitic words and the other commentary recently,” US assistant secretary of state for South Asian affairs Robert Blake said during a visit to Male on Saturday.

“Under President Nasheed, the Maldives tried to improve relations with Israel and showed what a progressive country they were and we really commend them for that.”

Majuli dossier sent to Unesco again

Posted on 8th February 2012 in The monuments of world

Jorhat, Feb. 8: The Centre has formally submitted a new dossier on Majuli to the Paris-headquartered Unesco to make a fresh cla-im for inclusion of Asia’s largest river island in the World Heritage Site List.

The 36th session of the World Heritage Committee convention (under Unesco) will be held at Saint Petersburg, Russia, from June 24 to July 6, during which Majuli’s claim for World Heritage Site tag will come up.

India is among the 21 countries which are members of the World Heritage committee that evaluates the proposals for World Heritage Site tags that flow in from across the world.

On January 24, the Archaeological Survey of India formally sent the 1,256-page dossier comprising six volumes, called River Island of Majuli, Cultural Landscape and Living Traditions in Midstream of Brahmaputra in Assam, to India’s permanent representative at Unesco headquarters in Paris, Vinay Sheel Oberoi.

He then submitted it to the global organisation.

Upper Assam commissioner S.I. Hussain, who is also the chief executive officer of the Majuli Cultural Landscape Management Authority, told The Telegraph here today that his office received a letter from the Archaeological Survey of India director-general, Gautam Sengupta, a few days back, stating that the “deferred” nomination (dossier) of Majuli island had been despatched to Paris.

The proposal, which has been sent for evaluation in the cultural landscape category, was approved by the Advisory Committee on World Heritage Matters of the Archaeological Survey of India.

Hussain said the letter stated that the Archaeological Survey of India has also requested the global organisation to send an International Council On Monuments and Sites evaluation team to the island for field verification.

The new dossier had been prepared by M/S Kshetra — a Hyderabad-based firm owned by conservation architect G. Suryanarayana Murthy — after several visits by Murthy and his team to the island last year.

The Archaeological Survey of India had deputed the firm to prepare a document after the last dossier was “deferred” by the 32nd World Heritage Committee convention held in Quebec in 2008.

Murthy told this correspondent today over phone from Hyderabad that the dossier in 2008 was deferred by the World Heritage Committee because it was not in tune with the changed guidelines of the panel.

He said reasons cited were lack of an inventory of all the xatras of Majuli, lack of appraisal of a Brahmaputra Basin study and proper management plan.

This will be a third attempt to clinch the World Heritage Site tag for Majuli.

Murthy said it was in 2004, at the 28th session World Heritage Committee convention held at Suzhou (China), that the first proposal to include Majuli in the coveted list was accepted.

At the 30th session of the convention held in Vilinius (Lithuania) in 2006, the proposal was “referred” back asking for additional queries.

The first demand for inclusion of Majuli in the World Heritage Site list came in 1998 from the Majuli Island Protection and Development Council, an NGO, which had former Rajya Sabha MP Arun Sarmah as its patron.

Top 10 places to propose

Posted on 7th February 2012 in The monuments of world

Agra, India: “There are few more enduring testaments to true love than the Taj Mahal,” say the editors of Cheapflights.ca. “Built by the Emperor Shah Jahan in memory of his wife it’s one of the world’s iconic monuments. Ram Bagh, the oldest Mughal garden, is 5 km from the Taj Mahal. The Persian garden, laid out in a way that suggests paradise, is a less clichéd location.” (Shutterstock)

Whitsundays, Australia: “Heart Reef is a naturally formed heart shape in the Whitsundays and it’s reassuringly inaccessible. The way to see it is to take a helicopter or seaplane journey and propose mid-air. We prefer Lindeman Island, most of which is national park.” (Shutterstock)

Vienna, Austria: “The Schonbrunn Palace, summer home of the Habsburgs, has a happy pedigree,” say the editors of Cheapflights.ca. “It was where Empress Maria Theresa once lived in wedded bliss with her husband and 16 children. It’s a noted proposing spot in the Imperial City, but another way to propose – bit more Jane Austen perhaps – is during a ball.” (Shutterstock)

Verona, Italy: “‘In fair Verona, where we lay our scene.’ Shakespeare lovers will know that Romeo and Juliet is set in the Italian city and there’s a balcony at Juliet’s House (off the Piazza delle Erbe) that is said to date from those times – but don’t be fooled,” say the editors of Cheapflights.ca. “It was added in 1936. Forget about the Casa di Giulietta and take a stroll through the Giardino Giusti instead. From the lofty tower of the Renaissance garden are gorgeous, tower-dotted and timeless views of Verona.” (Shutterstock)

Vancouver, British Columbia: “The City of Glass, as Douglas Coupland has it, is a tantalizing mix of mountains, big skies and sea. There’s only one place to propose (weather permitting) and that’s outside,” says Cheapflights.ca. “Queen Elizabeth Park is 130 acres of lush greenness but draws 6 million visitors each year. Lighthouse Park in West Vancouver is a more rugged affair. Its rainforest gives way to the sparkling waters of the Burrard Inlet.” (Shutterstock)

San Francisco, California: “Sure there’s the Golden Gate Bridge, the top of the Coit Tower at sunset or Harry Denton’s Starlight Room, but the Palace of the Legion of Honor, the fine arts museum, offers a little piece of Paris-inspired architecture and gorgeous views of the Bridge and the Bay,” say the editors of Cheapflights.ca. “It’s a noted spot for weddings too, should you wish to make a return visit.” (Shutterstock)

Paris, France: “The Jardin du Luxembourg was much loved by writers such as Baudelaire, Balzac, Hemingway and Sartre and our favourite spot for a proposal is a shady one by the Medici Fountain,” says Cheapflights.ca. “Commissioned by a king’s widow in the 17th century, the focal point is the statue of Acis and Galatea, the young lovers watched over by the powerful Polyphemus.” (Shutterstock)

New Orleans, Louisiana: “It’s easy to fall in love with the Big Easy, famed city of music, cuisine and a Phoenix-like character,” says Cheapflights.ca. “Bourbon Street will call you with its siren song of bars and booze but proposing here might not be the height of romance. Pop the question on the romantic old mahogany-lined Street Car instead or in the shade of the moss-clothed oak trees of Audobon Park.” (Shutterstock)

London, England: “A private capsule on the London Eye with truffles and champagne is one way to do it, but our suggestion is the 17th-century Monument that stands in the heart of the City of London,” says Cheapflights.ca. “Climb the 311 stone steps to the top – as generations of others have before you – and see the city laid out in all its ancient-meets-cutting edge glory.” (Shutterstock)

Granada, Spain: “The Alhambra, the ancient palace-citadel that sits high on a hill overlooking Granada, is one of the most romantic places in Spain,” say the editors of Cheapflights.ca. “Its intricate design and beautiful gardens with tinkling fountains are paradise for lovers. It’s a major tourist magnet so to mix up your Granada getaway, climb up to the Albaicin. The Arab quarter, that has heart-stopping views of the Alhambra, is a maze of cobblestone streets and small squares, balconies tumbling with bright geraniums and a magical air.” (Shutterstock)

Gandhi gambles on a poor Indian state

Posted on 5th February 2012 in The monuments of world

It was a small platform for a man working on the biggest political stage of his life.

Rahul Gandhi, India’s political pin-up and a man who might one day lead the world’s largest democracy, sat last week on a plastic chair on a slightly cramped podium in the dusty town of Sitapur in northern Uttar Pradesh state.

The deeply impoverished region heads to the polls next week to elect a new state assembly and Gandhi has led the campaigning for Congress, the party headed by his family that has dominated post-independence India.

Success will energise those clamouring for him to take on the prime minister’s job; failure will feed the doubters — and there are many — as well as interest in his sister Priyanka, whom some Gandhi loyalists still prefer.

Standing in his path is state leader Mayawati, a 56-year-old low-caste populist with a fetish for handbags and statues, making the multi-stage UP poll one of the most politically important and fascinating Indian contests in years.

After introductions from the local candidates, 41-year-old Gandhi tip-toed around the chairs on the stage, wearing running shoes with his traditional white shirt and pyjamas, and grasped both sides of the lectern.

His speaking style is confident nowadays in contrast to his nervy entry into politics in 2004, although he struggled to fire up a fairly docile crowd of about 5,000 on a small school playing field.

For 22 years — the time Congress has been out of power in UP — the state has lost out because of corruption and mismanagement which has worsened under Mayawati, said Gandhi, his party’s general secretary and youth leader.

“I get angry when I see UP lagging behind the rest of the country,” he declared, referring to a state with some of the worst indicators country-wide for child mortality, life expectancy, literacy and malnutrition.

It has a population of about 200 million and poverty as bad as anything found in sub-Sahara Africa. If it was a country in its own right it would be the fifth biggest measured by inhabitants, larger than Brazil.

Mayawati, whose BSP party champions the rights of those at the bottom of India’s social ladder, had lost touch, Rahul said. He, expensively educated and the son of a prime minister, could feel their pain.

“Yes I studied in England and later in the United States, but what I have learned from you over these last seven years is unparalleled,” he said.

A day later and a short distance up the road, Mayawati began her own campaign.

A packed crowd of up to 50,000, many transported in on free buses by local candidates, squabbled and gossiped before she arrived by helicopter, which drew gasps and applause.

The majority of supporters were low-caste farm labourers, who earn about 100 rupees (about $2) for a gruelling day’s work out in the field.

Mayawati had transformed their relations with the higher castes, some said, helping to ease the plight of a class of people once called “Untouchables” for their presumed physical and spiritual dirtiness.

“Earlier the upper caste people used to harass us,” said Sripal, a labourer aged about 60.

“Now when they do it, there is action taken against them,” he said, explaining that the police now responded to their complaints, sometimes even without money being exchanged.

Others dismissed corruption allegations that swirl around Mayawati’s administration, as well as criticism of her lavish spending on memorials, statues and monuments to low-caste icons — including herself.

“It was only one percent of the budget on statues, and she made all these new parks,” said Kuldeep Bhati, 35, repeating Mayawati’s own defence of the vast projects.

Her reputation for megalomania was enhanced by widely reported — and furiously denied — US embassy cables published by WikiLeaks which recounted “the first-rate egomaniac” sending a private jet to Mumbai to pick up some sandals.

She also drew flack in 2010 after she wore a giant garland made of 1,000-rupee bank notes.

Taking to the stage, she turned the tables on the Congress-led central government, lambasting it over corruption at the national level and accusing it of blocking her attempts to draw industry to Uttar Pradesh.

“It is the first time for this state that our government took up the cause of the Dalits and the deprived, as well as Muslims who were always neglected by successive regimes,” she said

Beyond the rallies, on the main street of Sitapur or in nearby villages where the fertile land produces sugar cane, mangoes and wheat, many disillusioned voters listed their grievances.

Corruption blights their lives; politicians appear every election time to make promises, only to fill their pockets the rest of the time; and a moribund economy provides no job opportunities for the young.

Electricity supplies are unreliable — a village AFP visited hadn’t had any in 15 days — and food inflation has caused more hardship.

Somu, a 25-year-old owner of a street teashop with a calf tethered in the corner, says he has to pay off the police every time he has a problem.

“Bribery and corruption are the main issues,” he told AFP. “The trouble is that only the poor are harassed. And only during elections do the politicians talk about it.”

Ravi Mishra, a 24-year-old graduate with a degree in biology, complains there are “no avenues for jobs here,” while others remember a long-closed plywood factory as the only industry nearby apart from sugar cane refineries.

UP has a legacy of mismanagement and corruption as woeful as anywhere in India, but the success of neighbouring Bihar — once a byword for human misery — has shown what can be achieved by forceful leadership.

Under chief minister Nitish Kumar, Bihar has shed its reputation as a lawless backwater, leading to surging economic growth and the sort of development yearned for by UP’s poor.

Which party the people of UP yearn to lead them will be realised on March 6 when results are announced.

India really has outgrown the need for UK aid

Posted on 2nd February 2012 in The monuments of world

British aid to India was once an admirable, benevolent gesture. But to carry on giving aid is a colossal failure to understand how the country
has changed.

Just consider the new India. The ninth largest economy in the world by GDP, it is growing at over seven per cent and is predicted to overtake the UK by 2022. There are more billionaires in India than in this country. Since India gained independence in 1947, Indians have squirrelled away more than
£900 billion in Swiss bank accounts, more than the rest of the world combined. India also gives £3.5 billion of aid to Africa and is spending £2 billion to put Indians into space.

The perfect example of this new India is the 27-storey skyscraper in Mumbai built by the industrialist Mukesh Ambani. At a cost of
£2 billion, it is the most expensive house in the world.

So why should British taxpayers send India £260 million of aid a year, which will amount to over a billion by 2015? Defenders of aid argue that India still has 600 million people living on less than $2 a day. That amounts to 30 per cent of the world’s poor, more than in all of sub-Saharan Africa. By giving aid, Britain is reaching out to parts of India nobody else does, not even Indians.
And no doubt it gives the British a nice moral glow. But it certainly does not buy influence.

This was cruelly demonstrated this week when the Indians, whose defence budget tops £22 billion, decided to buy 126 Rafale French planes rather than the British-backed Eurofighter Typhoon.

In the India that made that decision, British aid does not matter. Many Indians do not even know the British give aid and would not care if it stopped.

They would argue that their preference for the French fighters was based on pragmatic considerations of cost. As the Indians see it, they are a mature democracy. The country has many problems, not least corruption. But it has proved wrong the western naysayers who, at the time of independence, predicted India would collapse while Pakistan, unified by its Muslim religion,
would thrive.

So grown-up is this India that it no longer feels chippy about British rule. On a recent trip to some of India’s most revered monuments I was struck by how often the guide acknowledged the work of British rulers in helping to preserve these sites.

Britain’s status in India has declined: it is otherwise hard to explain why, for the past seven months, there has been only an acting High Commissioner in London. But there is still affection for the British. Last summer the Indian cricket captain used a Park Lane hotel to launch his sports foundation and not a week goes by without some Bollywood star visiting London. And during last week’s Republic Day celebrations, the present given to the guests was a DVD of beating the retreat, the British military tradition that is such an essential part of the Indian army. Yet India’s Republic Day was hardly noticed in this country.

Britain would be much better advised to forget the nonsense that aid helps to build ties. What is
needed is to develop links with the new India based on a shared history, which the Indians are now ready to acknowledge.

Mihir Bose’s new book, The Spirit of the Game: How Sport Made the Modern World, is out now (Constable, £18.99). Twitter: @mihirbose